Post by account_disabled on Dec 23, 2023 6:28:18 GMT -5
Clearly weakening the Christian vision and all progressivism. Massa is a politician without the blood of progressivism despite being deported a few days ago on a plane used to fly detainees to Rio de Janeiro. Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner's grandmother and mother were in Plaza de Mayo. Let him sit down in front of you. Plata. Massa has no third world mental map. It won't spark Beatlemania but the election will take place at the moment discussed today. Kish anyway.
Nelism says I am not even though Alberto Fernandez has very Job Function Email List important people in his cabinet and manages a large part of the national budget it behaves as if this government is not its own yes that is what is said but can anyone believe it In their autobiographies, they have found a of speech of the opposition party and the budgetary benefits of the ruling party. But to assume that anyone believes this is to underestimate the electorate and the base itself. What they are right about.
It seems to me that the fear of losing the story or what many call symbolic capital is diluted in the way they want to appear in history books is dominant at the heart of Christianity. I have not adjusted my disagreement with the IMF. There is discomfort in the Kirchnerist base. This is the third election in which Kirchnerism has not had its own presidential candidate. Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner represents a generation devastated by dictatorship.
A certain son was supposed to be in this position and ended up supporting one of the most political politicians in the country and she herself only jokingly called him a liar for cheating at the game. There seems to be only a general feeling of distrust and rejection of unity candidates in hard-line Kirchnerism that in order to stop the right they must accept the candidate who most closely resembles them. What is the current mentality of the La Campora base led by Maximo Kirchner and other members of the Kirchner space I think.
There is a bottleneck in interpretation and interpretation in Christendom. What's happening at the base of society is one thing and this month's photos of publicly synchronized and forced primary elections are crucial. But the question definitely refers to the militants' bases. I think it has everything there. There is a logical tension between some kind of pragmatist chief masquerading as organic discipline who decides that she knows what is right at this stage and those who imagine Christianity to have its own program and alternatives.